PALESTINIANS & ISRAELIS

0 comments
For people who are not Israeli, Zionist Christians etc., living in peace with the Palestinian Arabs is not an option, but rather a principle.

Biblical principles, beliefs, Zion, return to the land, fulfilling the promises, fulfillment of Bible prophecies etc., that’s all fine, and welcome, but when it comes to living in Israel side by side; these principles don’t always work.

Partially things work in Haifa and generally in Galilee.

When push comes to shove and war breaks out the Christians leave and go into the Christian spin. They get on Christian Prophetic or Eschatological TV networks and talk, making important faces and are so smart, because they have been there... under bombs I suppose. Self promotion.

We, Israelis, have to face the reality, there is no spin there, no talking, but bombing and shooting.

I made yeridah. Why? Because the extreme right pushes for something I am against. I see things in a prophetic timeline and this is not the way to go.

1. It is premature.
2. Orthodox (Jewish settlers) extremists spoil things for us.

Am I “Shalom Ahshav”? No. I was for Peres and Rabin when they showed peace initiatives with Yasser Arafat and Ehud Barack, but obviously there is the PLO/Fatah Charter which calls for the total destruction of Israel. So no peace deals can be made until this clause from their charter is removed, to put it childishly. But, by the same token, Israel does not have an official constitution to be guided by.

Read this:
1. An uncodified constitution is a type of constitution where the fundamental rules of government take the form of customs, usage, precedent and a variety of statutes and legal instruments. An understanding of the constitution is obtained through reading commentary by the judiciary, government committees or legal experts. In such a constitutional system, all these elements may be recognized by courts, legislators and the bureaucracy as binding upon government and limiting its powers.

So, courts rule.

2. An uncodified constitution has the advantages of elasticity, adaptability and resilience. A new condition or situation of government may be resolved by precedent or passing legislation. Unlike a codified constitution, there are no special procedures for making a constitutional law and it will not be inherently superior to other legislation. A country with an uncodified constitution lacks a specific moment where the principles of its government were deliberately decided. Instead, these are allowed to evolve according to the political and social forces arising throughout its history.

So, things change with time.

Based on this, Israel has the right to act the way it deems to be the right way of action, and who can stop that?

1. If the Bible is the guide then first we would have to take all discrepancies out.
2. Second, logical errors would have to eliminated.
3. Thirdly, the claim to the modern state of Israel based on the Bible would have to be ratified, but that would talk much more time.

Now. You Zionist marionette Christians: when strings are pulled you talk and act, but what do you know about the bigger picture?

According to the Zionist principle West Bank is Judea and Samaria, but Samaria was not Jewish was it? (in the time of Jesus).

Arabs claim to be the Canaanites and they have the Canaanite Center to prove it. I guess…

“Yassir Arafat [the chairman of the Palestinian Authority] first said he was a descendant of the Canaanites, but he now says he's a Jebusite. However, if you tried to do a DNA test on Arafat, you would be hard pressed to prove that he has any Jebusite blood running through his veins.

Most of the Arabs in that area came in from Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and other places after the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem in 638 A.D. Many modern Palestinians say they are descendants of the Canaanites.”

Go figure.

What did God say about it?

[Deuteronomy 20:17] But you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittite and the Amorite, the Canaanite and the Perizzite, the Hivite and the Jebusite, as the LORD your God has commanded you.

Did they? - No. Today we have a problem, but this problem started rather after Judah’s rerun from the Babylonian exile.

[Nehemiah 2:19] But when Sanballat the Horonite and Tobiah the Ammonite official, and Geshem the Arab heard it, they mocked us and despised us and said, “What is this thing you are doing? Are you rebelling against the king?”

Arabs moved in already then. The land was desolate for 70 years. That’s how quickly they move in.

Then came the Romans and they called this land Palestine. The root word is Philistia. P. and F. is interchangeable. Phalestinim (Hebrew) or Philistinim (Arabic).  Then came the 70 AD, another exile, Byzantine period, and the Crusaders period, then the Muslim period, then the Turkish empire and then (modern days) British mandate, UN partition and problems…    

Taking it all into account one ponders. Will Jews ever find peace? Either we have to keep on destroying the way Samuel told Saul to annihilate Amalek, or try to make peace the modern, diplomatic way. Hack them to pieces, chase them all the way to Egypt and Jordan, or deal with it.

Cheap Christian Zionist jabs won’t do. Feel something, and wipe that smirk off your face.

That’s my schtick. What’s yours?  

0 comments :

Post a Comment

Copyright 2011 THE BIBLE & POLITICS .
Blogger Template by Noct .